Outside the supermarket a three-year-old boy was expressing his distress in voice and reddened face. Solicitous, his mother bent down to him. No doubt he had wanted something in the shop and been denied it. He looked like me at that age and in a flash I recalled how I used to behave: a lot worse. My rage was not about wanting the thing, which tended to be arbitrary or even inappropriate for a small child. My mother should want to please me: that was the real issue, and it was never resolved because she had no maternal feelings, well some only: she did want to be proud of me and not ashamed. So I had a very definite sense of lack, that remained stable so long as I was at home or boarding school, places where life is ritualised routine. At university it took a while to find a niche, a few good friends. Then that ended and I lost touch with them all, and the world was an uncharted desert, and I was unnerved.

I do have a definite purpose in life, even when I don’t know what it is, which is most of the time, probably all the time if I’m honest. I mean my purpose is instinctive and it has been constant, though obviously I was unable to express it at the age of three. The tantrums were not surprising.

This is my purpose: I have to follow my nose, like a dog suddenly unleashed. On Sunday morning we had a good snowfall and I felt compelled to go and walk out in it, saying to myself “Where is a grandchild when you need one? We could build a snowman, go tobogganing.” But the nearest grandchild was 35 miles away and the snow would melt by afternoon. So I walked in it and when I took the public footpaths that criss-cross the hillside, going behind back-gardens and in between old factories, I did manage to get lost, which was an achievement so near home—the snow’s rather than mine. It was a good feeling to discover the usual landmarks altered, to be in a suddenly-created fairyland, , like a film set. Most of all it was the altered sound, not just the crunch of snow under my boots, but the hush: no echoes, only near sounds. Everything I heard was laid on a background of silence. Even when there’s no snow, like today, when I set out in sunshine, there’s a hush behind all the traffic noises, birdsong, scraps of conversation, rustling of wind in the trees. When you listen to the underlying silence, it leads you by the hand beyond normal consciousness to a co-existent dimension, interleaved with the world of senses.

My study’s getting littered with such scraps of half-written ideas: scribbled in notebooks, audio files, keyed documents abandoned incomplete in computer files. Actually, over the last couple of weeks my study is littered with scraps of half-written ideas: in my notebook, “My documents”, audiotape. Actually, it’s digital now, but icons, whether pictorial or verbal, must favour the concrete, and the recognizable shape.   Telephones don’t have shape any more, so we use the old standard one 🕿. For destroying documents, we may use a shredder, or the more cinematic act of burning them (1). For writing, we imagine putting pen to paper, or sitting at a typewriter; which can also be used to demonstrate creative frustration by pulling out an abandoned sheet, crumpling it, and flinging into a basket overflowing with other discarded paper. I think of Hank Bukowski:

“I can hear you typing at night,” says
my neighbor.

“oh, I’m sorry.”

“no,” he says, “it’s a pleasant sound…”

he’s right, it is.
and when I don’t cause that sound for
two or three days
I become fitful
my face gets an unhealthy sag, and–
you must believe me–
I have visions of the way that
I will die.

when typing I’m

well, maybe not immortal.
but habitually
this old typewriter and
this old man

live well together. (2)

So anyway yesterday I went on another bus ride and nearly lost my nerve on the way. When you have time to follow your nose and listen to the sound of silence you can easily fall into the illusion that you have gone mad. Perhaps this is the reason that most people unconsciously seek structure in their lives and social contact. And perhaps the reason people keep company, good or bad, is to get feedback that they are not insane loners or losers, which is fair enough but I have paid my dues to that and am grown-up now, and it’s only occasionally that everything seeps away, like there on the bus.

I was looking for a junk shop to get ideas for my latest construction project or perhaps even parts I could use for it. Never mind what the project is, and anyway, it was a vague excuse for a purpose. I went to the antique shop where I’d been a couple of times before. They always put a few bits of furniture out the front. I liked the new sign above the windows: “Curios”. But it was unfamiliar when I went in and I asked the man where the back rooms had gone. It used to be a labyrinth of nooks and passages He apologized and said the previous owner had moved out, and the next-door shop had taken over half the space. It was true, there were hastily-erected partitions and you couldn’t wander round as before. There used to be lots of books, now only a few. It was a little disorienting, so I thanked the man and left. It was sad to have found a wonderful curiosity shop, only to come back two weeks later and find it much changed. Continuing down the street for twenty yards I saw another set of furniture outside another shop. I walked in.

I have to call it a miracle. Two minutes earlier I had grieved for the irretrievable loss of a curiosity shop. Now it was restored in every particular, as if one could step back into the past and find it unchanged. In reality I’d walked into the wrong shop minutes earlier. This was the one I remembered. No walls had been moved, the merchandise, including those books, was all in its familiar place. I sought out my favourite corner, but a fat man was there filling the space, wide round the middle like a spinning-top, muttering to himself, examining each old music CD, emitting a faint odour. I pretended to look at other things for ten minutes till he left the space free. Then I found the treasure which justified my entire outing, including that moment on the bus when I had briefly felt unnerved like Jean-Paul Sartre’s character Antoine Roquentin in La Nausée. It was Prefaces by Bernard Shaw, first edition, 1934.

A most imposing volume: big, good paper, nicely bound; with an engraved title-page. And when I started to read it properly on the bus home, it fulfilled intellectually the promise of its physicality. Like meeting a woman with beauty of spirit as well as body. Like my Bible, I love to hold it in my hand, turn its pages, consult it randomly. Unlike my Bible, it is witty, wry, delightful; it engages the modern mind, it has relevance. Some of the pieces were written a hundred years ago, which is still in my grandparents’ lifetime: a good place to get perspective on today’s world.

Bukowski and George Bernard Shaw (3) : you wouldn’t think of them in the same breath but I do. Both radical critics of society, rooting out prejudice and lazy mind, holding nothing sacred except the truly sacred. Serious writers, as I too cannot help but be.

(1) I’ve discovered that the most effective way to destroy documents is to soak them in water till soggy, then squeeze into pulp.

(2) Excerpted from “This habit”, 1981, via this page

(3) I was eight when I heard the death of Bernard Shaw announced on the radio. I remember it because of my stepfather Kenneth’s reaction to the news. His interest was not in the plays so much as a view, shared with Shaw, that most of medicine is quackery, and that “nature cure” was our best guarantee of health. He would have burned anything by Bukowski; or perhaps drowned it & squeezed it to pulp.


15 thoughts on “Purpose

  1. “When you have time to follow your nose and listen to the sound of silence you can easily fall into the illusion that you have gone mad.”

    Well now, that explains a lot about me.


  2. The sounds of the mechanical parts of a typewriter, the force required to shift the levers of the keys, the feel of the letters pressing through a freshly typed sheet of paper.

    I remember sitting on my Grandfathers lap as he used his old typewriter. I have some of his typed pieces of paper to this day. I cherish them like I would no printer output.

    I remember the days of dot matrix printers. I purchased a set of colored ribbons for my old 24 pin dot matrix. I used a primitive form of registration to run the same piece of paper through the printer several times to create a color print.

    Imagine my dismay when someone I knew showed me the results they achieved from their new color thermal printer! It evaporated all the initiative I had for my new found technique.

    I should not have let it dissuade me. But I could not help but feel that others would not appreciate the effort it took for me to produce a crude color print that would not compare well to the new color prints.

    Today I vacillate between computer generated and more traditional mediums for creating art. I almost always enjoy the experience with traditional medium more. But I have learned that the more efficient computer generated process is more profitable.

    There is a terrible price to be paid for efficiency. The relentless pursuit of efficiency has somehow, created a less human or humane society.

    Young people have great difficulty seeing the benefits of the old ways. They find them to be too much trouble, it takes too much time. They find no source of satisfaction in the process, only the results.

    I'd like to find a way to take kids on a trip away from computers, cell phones, video games, tv. To teach them the old ways. Far away from the distractions and pressures of the world they have come to know.

    I suspect it would require some time for them to decompress. Acclimate to the sensory under-load.

    My Daughter has an opportunity to take a trip this summer to Mexico (Tijuana) to build a home for a needy family. Perhaps this would have a similar impact on her.

    Another nice post Vincent. My responses to your posts are almost always more inspired than the posts I make on my own blog. I need that kick in the pants to get the juices flowing.


  3. Glad to be of service providing a regular kick in the pants, Charles.

    As for teaching kids the old ways, I think the world itself will be providing that kick in the pants soon – I mean in the next hundred years which isn't long at all, for our grandchildren will be much involved in it. And their desire to learn will be stronger motivation than a parent or grandparent's desire to teach.


  4. Beth, you made me laugh! But I hope you can embrace the experience, squeeze something from it, for it won't last you know. None of it lasts.


  5. I wonder to myself what the book smelled like.

    I love walking into libraries, taking a big breath of the musty air, the smell of old books.

    Sometimes I can't help but hold up an old book to my nose, to quickly flip through the pages and let the breeze soar to my nose. It's a wonderful olfactory experience!


  6. Hayden, thanks for that. You prop up my confidence – still a bit wobbly!

    Sophia, on reading your comment I couldn't wait to bury my nose in the book and report on its smell. Its aroma is faint, and i cannot report because a language of book scent has not yet been devised. But this was to be expected as if it had a special appeal to that sense I would have already known it: especially as due to myopia I read very close with glasses pushed up on my forehead.


  7. Thanks for taking time to read our blog… I would love to watch the movie on Botswana no 1 lady dedective.. it sgreat story I read three books of the Author ..I loved it


  8. vincent
    thanks for the visit the other day. this piece is thought provoking on many levels–:where is a grandchild…” is priceless. Enjoyed the classic Buk…


  9. sort of angelic, lyrical.
    but i thought you don't read bible anymore. i thought religious texts are just literary pieces to you.

    how come you consult?

    btw, i liked that simile of a just unleashed dog following his nose, beautiful.


  10. I felt so sad until the finish, then you lifted me up and I felt very good for you, and felt hope for me.

    Your writing is excellent, keep typing on Vincent.


  11. Scot, thanks. I visit your site more than I leave remarks, but always enjoy.

    Ghetu, you asking about my real life? Or my fictional persona? Just kidding. I think I was a little misleading on the bible-reading. I do like to hold it etc, but don't “consult it randomly”. It is usually to check on some remembered text, for many quotes are engraved in memory from childhood.

    Jim, sad? You are not supposed to see any sadness but to gaze at the shiny comedic surface! I like that—“keep typing on”, for if I can do the typing bit I am sure that something will guide the fingers. As with yours, in all that tumultuous prophecy – which I think has “something of the night” – see my next piece!


  12. Vincent. Thanks for visiting my blog (Tales from the Typer), just now found some comments you left a few months ago. I love your blog-I now have lots of reading to do. Always good to find another Bukowski fan out there.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s